POONAWALLA FINCORP LIMITED vs VENAGRO NUTRIFOOD PRIVATE LIMITED — 18673/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: E/R Of Warrent. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

E/R Of Warrent Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CS - COMPLAINT CASE (SOUTH)

CNR: WBCS020205742022

Filing Number

20546/2022

Filing Date

03-Mar-2022

Registration No

18673/2022

Registration Date

15-Mar-2022

Court

Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAWALLA FINCORP LIMITED

    Adv. DEBOJYOTI SENGUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VENAGRO NUTRIFOOD PRIVATE LIMITED

  2. 2.AKULA PRATHIMA

  3. 3.AKULA VENU

  4. 4.SRIKANTH SUNKEY

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    E/R Of Warrent

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  3. 22-Dec-2025

    E/R Of Warrent

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  4. 04-Sep-2025

    Show Cause

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  5. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  6. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  7. 19-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  8. 17-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  9. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  10. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  11. 10-May-2023

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed petitions under sections 305 and 205 of Cr.PC filed by the accused. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Bagal was permitted to represent accused no.1 and accused nos.2, 3, and 4 (Telangana residents) on condition that they appear personally during plea consideration, section 313 examination, judgment delivery, and whenever directed by the court. The case was adjourned to 15.09.2023 for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 10-May-2023

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  13. 16-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  14. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  15. 13-Jun-2022

    Order

  16. 13-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  17. 20-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 03-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18673/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed petitions under sections 305 and 205 of Cr.PC filed by the accused. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Bagal was permitted to represent accused no.1 and accused nos.2, 3, and 4 (Telangana residents) on condition that they appear personally during plea consideration, section 313 examination, judgment delivery, and whenever directed by the court. The case was adjourned to 15.09.2023 for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case