MD RAFIQUE vs THE CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR INDIA — 56/2025
Case under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
MA - MISC APPEAL
CNR: WBCC010230792025
Filing Number
33564/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
56/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
City Civil Court, Calcutta
Judge
1-Chief Judge Bench
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD RAFIQUE
Adv. SAQUIB ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR INDIA
-
2.THE ESTATE OFFICER OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR INDIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The City Civil Court, Calcutta dismissed Miscellaneous Appeal No. 56 of 2025 for non-prosecution, finding that the appellant had deposited Rs. 13,890/- to the respondent authority on 18.03.2026, thereby resolving the dispute. Since the payment resolved the matter and the respondent raised no objection, the court found no legal impediment to dismissal and vacated any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Disposed
Chief Judge Bench
-
16-Apr-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing of Petition
Chief Judge Bench
-
12-Mar-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing of Petition
Chief Judge Bench
-
27-Feb-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing of Petition
Chief Judge Bench
-
28-Jan-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Put Up
Chief Judge Bench
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2025
The City Civil Court, Calcutta dismissed Miscellaneous Appeal No. 56 of 2025 for non-prosecution, finding that the appellant had deposited Rs. 13,890/- to the respondent authority on 18.03.2026, thereby resolving the dispute. Since the payment resolved the matter and the respondent raised no objection, the court found no legal impediment to dismissal and vacated any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts