MEHRUN NESA vs THE CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR INDIA — 51/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
MA - MISC APPEAL
CNR: WBCC010223102025
Filing Number
31747/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
51/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Court
City Civil Court, Calcutta
Judge
1-Chief Judge Bench
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MEHRUN NESA
Adv. SAQUIB ALI
-
2.MD SAHIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR INDIA
-
2.THE ESTATE OFFICER OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR INDIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The City Civil Court, Calcutta dismissed Miscellaneous Appeal No. 51 of 2025 for non-prosecution after the appellant deposited Rs. 2,17,100/- to the respondent authority on 17.02.2026. Since the appellant made the required payment and the respondent filed no objection, the court found no legal impediment to dismissal, vacating any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Disposed
Chief Judge Bench
-
16-Apr-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing of Petition
Chief Judge Bench
-
12-Mar-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing of Petition
Chief Judge Bench
-
23-Feb-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing of Petition
Chief Judge Bench
-
17-Feb-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing of Petition
Chief Judge Bench
-
04-Feb-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Put Up
Chief Judge Bench
-
28-Jan-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Chief Judge Bench
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2025
The City Civil Court, Calcutta dismissed Miscellaneous Appeal No. 51 of 2025 for non-prosecution after the appellant deposited Rs. 2,17,100/- to the respondent authority on 17.02.2026. Since the appellant made the required payment and the respondent filed no objection, the court found no legal impediment to dismissal, vacating any interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts