AXIS BANK LIMITED vs MOHAMED NAWAZ KHAN — 14990/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBCC010201122025

Filing Number

28371/2025

Filing Date

07-Nov-2025

Registration No

14990/2025

Registration Date

07-Nov-2025

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-LD Judge 3rd Bench

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK LIMITED

    Adv. Sayak Ranjan Ganguly

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMED NAWAZ KHAN

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  3. 11-Nov-2025

    Interlocatory OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is allowed. The court appointed Subrata Santra as Receiver to take possession of the vehicle (Reg. No. MN01AW4096) from the respondent who defaulted on loan installment payments. The petitioner must pay the Receiver Rs. 6,000 as remuneration. The matter is adjourned to 06.03.2026 for submission of the Receiver's report and further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Nov-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  5. 10-Nov-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14990/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is allowed. The court appointed Subrata Santra as Receiver to take possession of the vehicle (Reg. No. MN01AW4096) from the respondent who defaulted on loan installment payments. The petitioner must pay the Receiver Rs. 6,000 as remuneration. The matter is adjourned to 06.03.2026 for submission of the Receiver's report and further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case