INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD vs ARUNRAJ K — 13087/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBCC010175932025

Filing Number

24447/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

13087/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-LD Judge 3rd Bench

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD

    Adv. Tutul Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUNRAJ K

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Calcutta City Civil Court dismissed Indostar Capital Finance Ltd's miscellaneous case for failure to invoke arbitration proceedings within the mandatory 90-day period under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court discharged the receiver and ordered surrender of the subject vehicle to respondent Arunraj K, as Section 9 interim measures cannot be extended without timely arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  4. 20-Dec-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Interlocatory OrderView PDF

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13087/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta City Civil Court dismissed Indostar Capital Finance Ltd's miscellaneous case for failure to invoke arbitration proceedings within the mandatory 90-day period under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court discharged the receiver and ordered surrender of the subject vehicle to respondent Arunraj K, as Section 9 interim measures cannot be extended without timely arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case