INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD vs SHAZIYA SALIM CHANDAWALE — 13105/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBCC010175912025

Filing Number

24445/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

13105/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-LD Judge 3rd Bench

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD

    Adv. Tutul Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAZIYA SALIM CHANDAWALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 06-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The City Civil Court dismissed Indostar Capital Finance's miscellaneous case under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the mandatory 90-day period to invoke arbitration proceedings had elapsed without any action by the petitioner. The court discharged the appointed receiver and ordered possession of the subject vehicle be returned to respondent Shaziya Salim Chandawale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Interlocatory OrderView PDF

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13105/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The City Civil Court dismissed Indostar Capital Finance's miscellaneous case under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the mandatory 90-day period to invoke arbitration proceedings had elapsed without any action by the petitioner. The court discharged the appointed receiver and ordered possession of the subject vehicle be returned to respondent Shaziya Salim Chandawale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case