CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD. vs INDRAJIT SUTRADHAR — 13063/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBCC010174922025

Filing Number

24232/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

13063/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-LD Judge 3rd Bench

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. Ajay Kumar Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDRAJIT SUTRADHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Calcutta City Civil Court dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's miscellaneous case under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the 90-day period for invoking arbitration proceedings had elapsed without any action by the petitioner. The court held that Section 9 provides only interim relief, which cannot be extended beyond 90 days without formal invocation of arbitration, and ordered the receiver discharged with vehicle possession returned to respondent Indrajit Sutradhar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  4. 20-Dec-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    Interlocatory OrderView PDF

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13063/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta City Civil Court dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's miscellaneous case under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the 90-day period for invoking arbitration proceedings had elapsed without any action by the petitioner. The court held that Section 9 provides only interim relief, which cannot be extended beyond 90 days without formal invocation of arbitration, and ordered the receiver discharged with vehicle possession returned to respondent Indrajit Sutradhar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case