CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD. vs INDRAJIT SUTRADHAR — 13063/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.
MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: WBCC010174922025
Filing Number
24232/2025
Filing Date
16-09-2025
Registration No
13063/2025
Registration Date
16-09-2025
Court
City Civil Court, Calcutta
Judge
3-LD JUDGE 3rd BENCH
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
Adv. Ajay Kumar Das
Respondent(s)
INDRAJIT SUTRADHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-LD JUDGE 3rd BENCH
Disposed
SR/AD/Appearence
SR/AD/Appearence
SR/AD/Appearence
SR/AD/Appearence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-12-2025 | SR/AD/Appearence |
| 18-09-2025 | SR/AD/Appearence |
| 17-09-2025 | SR/AD/Appearence |
| 16-09-2025 | SR/AD/Appearence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Calcutta City Civil Court dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's miscellaneous case under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the 90-day period for invoking arbitration proceedings had elapsed without any action by the petitioner. The court held that Section 9 provides only interim relief, which cannot be extended beyond 90 days without formal invocation of arbitration, and ordered the receiver discharged with vehicle possession returned to respondent Indrajit Sutradhar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Calcutta City Civil Court dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's miscellaneous case under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the 90-day period for invoking arbitration proceedings had elapsed without any action by the petitioner. The court held that Section 9 provides only interim relief, which cannot be extended beyond 90 days without formal invocation of arbitration, and ordered the receiver discharged with vehicle possession returned to respondent Indrajit Sutradhar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts