INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD vs SANIULLA MANDAL — 12820/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBCC010170942025

Filing Number

23652/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

12820/2025

Registration Date

11-Sep-2025

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-LD Judge 3rd Bench

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD

    Adv. Tutul Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANIULLA MANDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The City Civil Court, Calcutta dismissed INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD's miscellaneous case for failure to invoke arbitration proceedings within the mandatory 90-day period under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner took no steps at the hearing, and the court found no grounds to extend the interim measure. The appointed Receiver was discharged, and possession of the subject vehicle was ordered to be surrendered to respondent Saniulla Mandal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  6. 17-Sep-2025

    Interlocatory OrderView PDF

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  8. 12-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    LD Judge 3rd Bench

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12820/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The City Civil Court, Calcutta dismissed INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD's miscellaneous case for failure to invoke arbitration proceedings within the mandatory 90-day period under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner took no steps at the hearing, and the court found no grounds to extend the interim measure. The appointed Receiver was discharged, and possession of the subject vehicle was ordered to be surrendered to respondent Saniulla Mandal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case