SATYA PRAKASH DHAR vs REBA DAS — 1786/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

TS - TITLE SUIT

CNR: WBCC010093182023

Filing Number

14194/2023

Filing Date

12-Sep-2023

Registration No

1786/2023

Registration Date

12-Sep-2023

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

2-LD Judge 2nd Bench

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYA PRAKASH DHAR

    Adv. Manabendra Saha Roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REBA DAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed plaintiff Satya Prakash Dhar's eviction suit against defendant Reba Das. The judge found that since original tenant Naba Kumar Das died before the 1997 Tenancy Act came into force, tenancy inheritance is governed by the 1956 Act and succession law, not the 1997 Act's provisions. Consequently, the defendant retained valid tenancy rights, and the plaintiff failed to establish his eviction claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  10. 01-Sep-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  13. 07-Jul-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  14. 19-May-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  15. 17-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  16. 17-Apr-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  17. 24-Feb-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  18. 06-Dec-2024

    OrderView PDF

  19. 06-Dec-2024

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  20. 01-Oct-2024

    OrderView PDF

  21. 01-Oct-2024

    Argument / Further Argument

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  22. 21-Sep-2024

    Interlocatory OrderView PDF

  23. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  24. 02-Sep-2024

    OrderView PDF

  25. 02-Sep-2024

    OrderView PDF

  26. 02-Sep-2024

    Further Evidence

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  27. 13-Aug-2024

    OrderView PDF

  28. 13-Aug-2024

    Further Evidence

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  29. 24-Jul-2024

    OrderView PDF

  30. 24-Jul-2024

    Further Evidence

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  31. 06-May-2024

    OrderView PDF

  32. 06-May-2024

    Peremptory Hearing Of The Suit

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  33. 28-Feb-2024

    OrderView PDF

  34. 28-Feb-2024

    Peremptory Hearing Of The Suit

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  35. 19-Jan-2024

    Issues

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  36. 17-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    LD Judge 2nd Bench

  37. 12-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 12-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1786/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed plaintiff Satya Prakash Dhar's eviction suit against defendant Reba Das. The judge found that since original tenant Naba Kumar Das died before the 1997 Tenancy Act came into force, tenancy inheritance is governed by the 1956 Act and succession law, not the 1997 Act's provisions. Consequently, the defendant retained valid tenancy rights, and the plaintiff failed to establish his eviction claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case