Sabida Khatun vs Tapas Modak — 165/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MACC

CNR: WBCC010045772025

Filing Number

6707/2025

Filing Date

02-Apr-2025

Registration No

165/2025

Registration Date

02-Apr-2025

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

1-Chief Judge Bench

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sabida Khatun

    Adv. Sumita Biswas

  2. 2.Somir Sekh

  3. 3.Salma Umme

  4. 4.Saharjan Bibi

  5. 5.Amiruddin Sekh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tapas Modak

  2. 2.Cholamandalam MS General Ins. Com. Ltd.

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: In MAC Case 165 of 2025, the court allowed Opposite Party No. 2's adjournment petition citing that the Presiding Officer was deputed for SIR work. The case was adjourned for ends of justice with the next hearing fixed for 16-06-2026, when Opposite Party No. 2 must file written statements and the applicant must take fresh steps against Opposite Party No. 1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Chief Judge Bench

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Chief Judge Bench

  6. 09-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Chief Judge Bench

  8. 03-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  9. 03-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Chief Judge Bench

  10. 02-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 02-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In MAC Case 165 of 2025, the court allowed Opposite Party No. 2's adjournment petition citing that the Presiding Officer was deputed for SIR work. The case was adjourned for ends of justice with the next hearing fixed for 16-06-2026, when Opposite Party No. 2 must file written statements and the applicant must take fresh steps against Opposite Party No. 1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case