SRI TAPAS KANTA SEN vs SRI SAMIR KUMAR SEN — 15333/2014
Disposed: Contested--Decree on 12th July 2017.
TS - TITLE SUIT
CNR: WBCC010037182006
Filing Number
34377/2014
Filing Date
27-Nov-2006
Registration No
15333/2014
Registration Date
27-Nov-2006
Court
City Civil Court, Calcutta
Judge
10-LD Judge 10th Bench
Decision Date
12-Jul-2017
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decree
Last updated 27-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI TAPAS KANTA SEN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI SAMIR KUMAR SEN
-
2.SM. RANJITA DEY
-
3.SM,. KAMALA SEN
-
4.SRI RABIN SEN
-
5.SM. TAPATI DAS
-
6.SMT. ARATI DUTTA
-
7.SM. ANIMA PAUL
-
8.DIPANKAR DAS
-
9.SM. SHIKHA DEY
-
10.LIKHA CHANDRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jul-2017
JudgmentView PDF
-
12-Jul-2017
Disposed
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
05-Jul-2017
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
04-Jul-2017
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
22-Jun-2017
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
12-Jun-2017
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
10-Apr-2017
Evidence of Defence Witness
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
20-Mar-2017
Evidence of Defence Witness
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
10-Mar-2017
Further Evidence
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
24-Jan-2017
Peremptory Hearing Of The Suit
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
29-Nov-2016
Issues
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
29-Sep-2016
Steps
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
03-Aug-2016
Steps
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
21-Mar-2016
Hearing of Petition
-
18-Nov-2015
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
03-Aug-2015
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
24-Jun-2015
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
25-May-2015
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
09-Apr-2015
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
20-Feb-2015
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
24-Feb-2014
Hearing of Petition
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
23-Dec-2013
Sr/Ad/Appearence
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
20-Nov-2013
Sr/Ad/Appearence
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
17-Sep-2013
Steps
LD Judge 10th Bench
-
03-Sep-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2006
Case filed
Registration No. 15333/2014
SUMMARY: The suit for declaration and partition was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court declared the plaintiff's right, title and interest to 4/15th share in the property, and similarly declared shares for other defendants and pro-defendants. The court rejected the defendants' objections regarding lis pendency and maintainability, holding that the suit was properly maintainable. The parties are directed to partition the property amicably within 60 days, or either party may request court-appointed commissioner to execute the partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts