MAA MANASHA ENTERPRISE vs SUTAPA DEY — 264/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: SR/AD/Appearence. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

TS - TITLE SUIT

CNR: WBCC010014782026

SR/AD/Appearence

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

Filing Number

2660/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

264/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

City Civil Court, Calcutta

Judge

2-LD JUDGE 2nd BENCH

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

MAA MANASHA ENTERPRISE

Adv. NISHA DAS

Respondent(s)

SUTAPA DEY

SHYAMALI DEY

BANDANA DAS

DIPALI MALLIK

CHANDANA SADHUKHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 2-LD JUDGE 2nd BENCH

05-03-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

06-02-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

29-01-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

Interim Orders

06-02-2026
Interlocatory Order

Case Summary Ad-interim injunction granted. The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo injunction, restraining defendants from entering into alternative development agreements, selling, transferring, or demolishing the suit property until 05.03.2026. Defendants have been issued notice to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Ad-interim injunction granted. The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo injunction, restraining defendants from entering into alternative development agreements, selling, transferring, or demolishing the suit property until 05.03.2026. Defendants have been issued notice to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

City Civil Court, Calcutta All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case