MAA MANASHA ENTERPRISE vs SUTAPA DEY — 264/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
TS - TITLE SUIT
CNR: WBCC010014782026
Filing Number
2660/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
264/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
City Civil Court, Calcutta
Judge
2-LD Judge 2nd Bench
Last updated 08-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAA MANASHA ENTERPRISE
Adv. NISHA DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUTAPA DEY
-
2.SHYAMALI DEY
-
3.BANDANA DAS
-
4.DIPALI MALLIK
-
5.CHANDANA SADHUKHAN
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
LD Judge 2nd Bench
-
06-Feb-2026
Interlocatory OrderView PDF
Case Summary Ad-interim injunction granted. The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo injunction, restraining defendants from entering into alternative development agreements, selling, transferring, or demolishing the suit property until 05.03.2026. Defendants have been issued notice to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
LD Judge 2nd Bench
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 264/2026
Case Summary Ad-interim injunction granted. The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo injunction, restraining defendants from entering into alternative development agreements, selling, transferring, or demolishing the suit property until 05.03.2026. Defendants have been issued notice to show cause within 15 days why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts