Govt of West Bengal vs RATNA ROY — 401/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,323,427,435,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBCB070016172020
Filing Number
401/2020
Filing Date
08-Apr-2024
Registration No
401/2020
Registration Date
08-Apr-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar
Judge
3-Acjm
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
DINHATA
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt of West Bengal
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RATNA ROY
-
2.BAPPA ROY
-
3.JANAKI ROY @ KANIKA BARMAN
-
4.NURJAMAL MIAH
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Evidence
Acjm
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Acjm
-
26-Nov-2025
Copy of orderView PDF
Case 401/2020 Summary: Charges were framed against accused Ratna Roy, Bappa Roy, Janaki Roy @ Kanika Barman, and Nurjamal Miah under IPC sections 448/323/427/435/34 (criminal trespass, voluntarily causing hurt, mischief, arson, and criminal conspiracy). All accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The case is adjourned to 20.01.26 for examination of first prosecution witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Nov-2025
Appearance
Acjm
-
09-Oct-2025
Copy of orderView PDF
-
09-Oct-2025
Appearance
Acjm
-
09-Jun-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
12-Feb-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
10-Jan-2025
Appearance
Acjm
-
22-Nov-2024
Appearance
Acjm
-
13-Sep-2024
Copy of orderView PDF
-
13-Sep-2024
Appearance
Acjm
-
12-Jun-2024
Appearance
Acjm
-
12-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 401/2020
Case 401/2020 Summary: Charges were framed against accused Ratna Roy, Bappa Roy, Janaki Roy @ Kanika Barman, and Nurjamal Miah under IPC sections 448/323/427/435/34 (criminal trespass, voluntarily causing hurt, mischief, arson, and criminal conspiracy). All accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The case is adjourned to 20.01.26 for examination of first prosecution witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts