NUR KHATUN BIBI vs AYUB MIAH — 133/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115,3. Status: Examination of Sa. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Examination of Sa Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Complaint Case

CNR: WBCB070012472025

Filing Number

5368/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

133/2025

Registration Date

25-Nov-2025

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar

Judge

5-Jm

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NUR KHATUN BIBI

    Adv. Jayanta Kumar Bhowmik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AYUB MIAH

  2. 2.SERAJUL MIAH

  3. 3.AKIMA ELIAS AKI BIBI

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Examination of Sa

    Jm

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Examination of Sa

    Jm

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case 133/2025 Summary: In this pre-cognizance hearing, the Judicial Magistrate at Dinhata Court rejected the suspects' (Ayub Miah, Serajul Miah, and Akima Elias Aki Bibi) argument that the complaint was false and lacked sufficient material to constitute an offense. The Court found the complaint facts sufficient to indicate potential offenses and took cognizance of the case. The matter is adjourned to 13-03-2026 for further proceedings, with the complainant directed to produce witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Examination of Sa

    Jm

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Jm

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 133/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 133/2025 Summary: In this pre-cognizance hearing, the Judicial Magistrate at Dinhata Court rejected the suspects' (Ayub Miah, Serajul Miah, and Akima Elias Aki Bibi) argument that the complaint was false and lacked sufficient material to constitute an offense. The Court found the complaint facts sufficient to indicate potential offenses and took cognizance of the case. The matter is adjourned to 13-03-2026 for further proceedings, with the complainant directed to produce witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case