Govt of West Bengal vs Bishnu Pada Sarkar — 5294/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBCB070011642025
Filing Number
1161/2025
Filing Date
02-Nov-2023
Registration No
5294/2025
Registration Date
24-Oct-2025
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar
Judge
6-Jm II
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
333
Police Station
Sahebganj
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt of West Bengal
Adv. APPDinhata
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bishnu Pada Sarkar
-
2.Bimal Sarkar
-
3.Lipika Sarkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Judgement
The court acquitted all three accused (Bishnu Pada Sarkar, Bimal Sarkar, and Lipika Sarkar) of charges under IPC sections 341/323/325/506/34, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key deficiencies included contradictory witness testimonies, a nine-day delay in FIR filing, discrepancy between alleged serious injury and minor medical findings, and lack of corroboration by independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm II
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of order
-
16-Mar-2026
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Jm II
-
20-Feb-2026
Copy of order
-
20-Feb-2026
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Jm II
-
29-Jan-2026
Copy of order
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jm II
-
28-Jan-2026
Copy of order
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jm II
-
30-Dec-2025
Copy of order
-
30-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 5294/2025
The court acquitted all three accused (Bishnu Pada Sarkar, Bimal Sarkar, and Lipika Sarkar) of charges under IPC sections 341/323/325/506/34, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key deficiencies included contradictory witness testimonies, a nine-day delay in FIR filing, discrepancy between alleged serious injury and minor medical findings, and lack of corroboration by independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts