FAJLE MIAH vs AMJAD MIAH — 119/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,115,117,74,3. Status: Examination of Sa. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Examination of Sa Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

Complaint Case

CNR: WBCB070011472025

Filing Number

1144/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

119/2025

Registration Date

16-Oct-2025

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar

Judge

5-Jm

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,115,117,74,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAJLE MIAH

    Adv. Tapan Basak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMJAD MIAH

  2. 2.AJIJUL MIAH

  3. 3.ASHRAFUL MIAH

  4. 4.SAHABUL MIAH

  5. 5.AJIMA BIBI

  6. 6.MINA BIBI

  7. 7.PARVINA BIBI

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case 119/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate at Dinhata, during pre-cognizance hearing on 06.05.2026, took cognizance of the offence against suspects Amjad Miah, Ajijul Miah, and Ashraful Miah based on facts alleged in the complaint by Fajle Miah. The court rejected the suspects' argument that no legal grounds existed for cognizance, finding the complaint facts sufficiently reflect commission of offences warranting trial. The case is adjourned to 19.06.2026 for further proceedings, with the complainant directed to produce witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Examination of Sa

    Jm

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jm

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jm

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jm

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jm

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 119/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate at Dinhata, during pre-cognizance hearing on 06.05.2026, took cognizance of the offence against suspects Amjad Miah, Ajijul Miah, and Ashraful Miah based on facts alleged in the complaint by Fajle Miah. The court rejected the suspects' argument that no legal grounds existed for cognizance, finding the complaint facts sufficiently reflect commission of offences warranting trial. The case is adjourned to 19.06.2026 for further proceedings, with the complainant directed to produce witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case