Govt of West Bengal vs UKIL DEBNATH — 81/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBCB070009792022

Filing Number

81/2022

Filing Date

24-Jul-2023

Registration No

81/2022

Registration Date

24-Jul-2023

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar

Judge

3-Acjm

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

DINHATA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt of West Bengal

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UKIL DEBNATH

  2. 2.RABI DEBNATH

  3. 3.MANORANJAN DEBNATH

  4. 4.BHOLA DEBNATH

  5. 5.RATNA DEBNATH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: GR Case No. 81/2022 Court Decision: All five accused persons (Ukil Debnath, Rabi Debnath, Manoranjan Debnath, Bhola Debnath, and Ratna Debnath) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341/323/354/506/34. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps, including missing medical records despite victims' claims of hospital treatment, inconsistent witness accounts, absence of key eyewitness testimony, and lack of corroborating evidence establishing the accused's presence or involvement in the alleged assault and outrage of modesty incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  5. 06-Jun-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

  6. 06-Jun-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  7. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Acjm

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Acjm

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Acjm

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Acjm

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Acjm

  13. 15-Nov-2025

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Acjm

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Acjm

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Copy of orderView PDF

  16. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 12-Aug-2025

    Copy of orderView PDF

  18. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 31-Jul-2025

    Copy of orderView PDF

  20. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 19-Sep-2024

    Copy of orderView PDF

  26. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 01-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Acjm

  28. 13-Feb-2024

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Acjm

  29. 04-Nov-2023

    Charge

    Acjm

  30. 05-Oct-2023

    Copy of orderView PDF

  31. 05-Oct-2023

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Acjm

  32. 01-Aug-2023

    Copy of orderView PDF

  33. 01-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 24-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: GR Case No. 81/2022 Court Decision: All five accused persons (Ukil Debnath, Rabi Debnath, Manoranjan Debnath, Bhola Debnath, and Ratna Debnath) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 341/323/354/506/34. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps, including missing medical records despite victims' claims of hospital treatment, inconsistent witness accounts, absence of key eyewitness testimony, and lack of corroborating evidence establishing the accused's presence or involvement in the alleged assault and outrage of modesty incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case