Govt of West Bengal vs JAYANTA BARMAN — 270/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBCB070007382023

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

270/2023

Filing Date

18-03-2024

Registration No

270/2023

Registration Date

18-03-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar

Judge

4-ACJM II

FIR Details

FIR Number

197

Police Station

Sahebganj

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A

Petitioner(s)

Govt of West Bengal

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JAYANTA BARMAN

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ACJM II

13-03-2026

Evidence

27-11-2025

Evidence

02-09-2025

Evidence

05-06-2025

Evidence

14-02-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-04-2024
Copy of order
23-07-2024
Copy of order
08-10-2024
Copy of order
09-01-2025
Copy of order
14-02-2025
Copy of order
05-06-2025
Copy of order
02-09-2025
Copy of order

Case Summary: GR(1) 270/2023 The case was adjourned to 27.11.2025. The court examined and discharged two prosecution witnesses (CSW-2 and CSW-3). However, the Investigating Officer (ASI Satyendra Paul) violated court orders by failing to produce CSW-1 as directed, prompting the court to issue a show-cause notice requiring the IO to appear personally and explain why proceedings under IPC Section 176 (misconduct by public servant) should not be initiated against him. The SDPO Dinhata was also directed to take appropriate action against those responsible for the judicial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: GR(1) 270/2023 The case was adjourned to 27.11.2025. The court examined and discharged two prosecution witnesses (CSW-2 and CSW-3). However, the Investigating Officer (ASI Satyendra Paul) violated court orders by failing to produce CSW-1 as directed, prompting the court to issue a show-cause notice requiring the IO to appear personally and explain why proceedings under IPC Section 176 (misconduct by public servant) should not be initiated against him. The SDPO Dinhata was also directed to take appropriate action against those responsible for the judicial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case