Latifa Bibi vs Mafidul Miah — 35/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 128(3). Status: Executionof W.A/Wpa. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
Misc. Execution Case
CNR: WBCB070002082022
Filing Number
208/2022
Filing Date
21-Apr-2022
Registration No
35/2022
Registration Date
21-Apr-2022
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata, Coochbehar
Judge
3-Acjm
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Latifa Bibi
Adv. Masud Hossain
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mafidul Miah
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
13-Mar-2026
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
08-Dec-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
23-Jul-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
01-Apr-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
04-Dec-2024
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
31-Jul-2024
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
12-Feb-2024
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
01-Sep-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
Case 35/2022 (Latifa Bibi v. Mafidul Miah) - Summary: The case was adjourned to 12.02.2024 for examination/reply of written arguments. The petitioner appeared before the Dinhata court on 01.09.2023, but the requisite documents were not filed and the learned P.O was on leave. The court directed that requisite documents be filed immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Sep-2023
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
14-Jul-2023
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
01-Mar-2023
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
06-Jan-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
06-Jan-2023
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
22-Nov-2022
Copy of orderView PDF
-
22-Nov-2022
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
17-Oct-2022
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
23-Sep-2022
Copy of orderView PDF
-
23-Sep-2022
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
22-Jul-2022
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
21-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2022
Case 35/2022 (Latifa Bibi v. Mafidul Miah) - Summary: The case was adjourned to 12.02.2024 for examination/reply of written arguments. The petitioner appeared before the Dinhata court on 01.09.2023, but the requisite documents were not filed and the learned P.O was on leave. The court directed that requisite documents be filed immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts