Govt of West Bengal vs MAFIJAL MIAH — 142/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),126(2),115(2),118(2),109,3(5). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 16th September 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBCB050006352025
Filing Number
468/2025
Filing Date
04-Sep-2025
Registration No
142/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Dinhata, Coochbehar
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
230
Police Station
SITAI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAFIJAL MIAH
-
2.AMIR HOSSAIN
-
3.MAFIA BIBI
-
4.AMINA BIBI
Case History
-
16-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
orderView PDF
Case 142/2025 Summary In this Sessions case filed by the Government of West Bengal against Mafijal Miah, Amir Hossain, and Mafia Bibi, the court adjourned proceedings to 16.09.26 for appearance and consideration of charge. Two accused (Mafijal Miah and Mafia Bibi) appeared in person, while Amir Hossain was absent by petition. The court granted a final extension for time as requested by both the prosecution and defence counsel. All three accused remain on court bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Charge
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
orderView PDF
-
06-Dec-2025
Appearance
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
orderView PDF
-
01-Nov-2025
Appearance
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
orderView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 142/2025
Case 142/2025 Summary In this Sessions case filed by the Government of West Bengal against Mafijal Miah, Amir Hossain, and Mafia Bibi, the court adjourned proceedings to 16.09.26 for appearance and consideration of charge. Two accused (Mafijal Miah and Mafia Bibi) appeared in person, while Amir Hossain was absent by petition. The court granted a final extension for time as requested by both the prosecution and defence counsel. All three accused remain on court bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts