Govt of West Bengal vs Bharat Barman — 35/2025
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 4. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
POCSO Cases - Prevention of Child from sexua
CNR: WBCB050005062025
Filing Number
375/2025
Filing Date
19-Jul-2025
Registration No
35/2025
Registration Date
19-Jul-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Dinhata, Coochbehar
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
93
Police Station
SITAI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt of West Bengal
Adv. Taherul Islam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bharat Barman
-
2.Lakhsmi Barman
-
3.DHano Barman
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
Case Summary - POCSO-35/2025: The case was adjourned as the sole accused Bharat Barman (on court bail) was absent after filing a petition under Section 317 of CrPC, and no witnesses appeared for evidence. The court fixed new dates (12.08.26 to 14.08.26) for recording evidence and directed summons to be issued to all witnesses, with a mandatory requirement for the accused's presence at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
orderView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
orderView PDF
-
12-Aug-2025
Charge
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
orderView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2025
Case Summary - POCSO-35/2025: The case was adjourned as the sole accused Bharat Barman (on court bail) was absent after filing a petition under Section 317 of CrPC, and no witnesses appeared for evidence. The court fixed new dates (12.08.26 to 14.08.26) for recording evidence and directed summons to be issued to all witnesses, with a mandatory requirement for the accused's presence at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts