ARati PRamanik or Barman vs Govt of West Bengal — 53/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: WBCB050001802026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Dinhata, Coochbehar

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

SITAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARati PRamanik or Barman

    Adv. Tathagata Banerjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Govt of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary of Case 53/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Dinhata rejected the bail application of Arati Pramanik @ Barman under section 483 of BNSS in a homicide case. The court found the investigating officer's bail objection credible, noting suspicious details in the accused's confessional statements and the victim's death being medically certified as homicidal (asphyxia by hanging with blunt-force head injuries). The court flagged investigative lacunae for review by the trial court but determined bail denial was warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 53/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Dinhata rejected the bail application of Arati Pramanik @ Barman under section 483 of BNSS in a homicide case. The court found the investigating officer's bail objection credible, noting suspicious details in the accused's confessional statements and the victim's death being medically certified as homicidal (asphyxia by hanging with blunt-force head injuries). The court flagged investigative lacunae for review by the trial court but determined bail denial was warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case