State Of West Bengal vs Alam Md. — 1410/2014
Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBCB010027392013
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8246/2014
Filing Date
22-02-2013
Registration No
1410/2014
Registration Date
28-02-2013
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Petitioner(s)
State Of West Bengal
Adv. P.P
Respondent(s)
Alam Md.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 31-01-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 06-01-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 28-05-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar, acquitted Alam Mahammad of charges under IPC sections 366 (kidnapping) and 376 (rape) due to insufficient corroborating evidence. Although the victim testified to kidnapping and rape, medical evidence showed no signs of sexual assault, and critical witnesses (bus conductors, neighbours) were not examined to corroborate her account. The victim's story was deemed "highly improbable" given inconsistencies between her oral testimony and medical/documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar, acquitted Alam Mahammad of charges under IPC sections 366 (kidnapping) and 376 (rape) due to insufficient corroborating evidence. Although the victim testified to kidnapping and rape, medical evidence showed no signs of sexual assault, and critical witnesses (bus conductors, neighbours) were not examined to corroborate her account. The victim's story was deemed "highly improbable" given inconsistencies between her oral testimony and medical/documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts