State Of West Bengal vs Subhankar Mandal — 77/2024
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20(b)(ii)(C),25/29. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
N D P S Case - NDPS Case
CNR: WBCB010027022024
Filing Number
2219/2024
Filing Date
07-Oct-2024
Registration No
77/2024
Registration Date
07-Oct-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
817
Police Station
PUNDIBARI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of West Bengal
Adv. P.P In charge
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subhankar Mandal
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
OrderView PDF
In NDPS Case 77/2024, the court adjourned proceedings to 16.06.2026 for evidence of the second prosecution witness. Accused Subhankar Mandal remained in judicial custody (remanded to J.C.), while co-accused Bharat Barman continued on court bail. No bail petition was filed for the custody accused, and the adjournment was necessitated by the absence of witnesses and non-receipt of summon returns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
31-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
19-Mar-2026
Put Up
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
18-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
06-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Charge / Plea Hearing/Appearence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
22-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
Charge / Plea Hearing/Appearence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
09-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Charge / Plea Hearing/Appearence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
05-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
08-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
08-Jul-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
05-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
05-Jun-2025
Er of W/W/A
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
15-May-2025
OrderView PDF
-
15-May-2025
Er of W/W/A
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
23-Apr-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
09-Apr-2025
OrderView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
28-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
18-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
-
18-Mar-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
07-Mar-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
25-Feb-2025
OrderView PDF
-
25-Feb-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
11-Feb-2025
OrderView PDF
-
11-Feb-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
28-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
28-Jan-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
14-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
14-Jan-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
06-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
06-Jan-2025
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
17-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
17-Dec-2024
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
06-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
06-Dec-2024
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
04-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
Put Up
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
03-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
03-Dec-2024
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
25-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
25-Nov-2024
Put Up
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
21-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
21-Nov-2024
Put Up
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
11-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
11-Nov-2024
Production
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
07-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2024
In NDPS Case 77/2024, the court adjourned proceedings to 16.06.2026 for evidence of the second prosecution witness. Accused Subhankar Mandal remained in judicial custody (remanded to J.C.), while co-accused Bharat Barman continued on court bail. No bail petition was filed for the custody accused, and the adjournment was necessitated by the absence of witnesses and non-receipt of summon returns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts