State Of West Bengal vs Abu Bakkar Siddik — 3/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,468,471. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.

Special Court Cases

CNR: WBCB010021312017

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1877/2017

Filing Date

21-02-2017

Registration No

3/2017

Registration Date

21-02-2017

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

125

Police Station

SITALKUCHI

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420,409,468,471

Petitioner(s)

State Of West Bengal

Adv. P.P

Respondent(s)

Abu Bakkar Siddik

Alauddin Miya

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

07-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

03-02-2026

Evidence

14-01-2026

Evidence

02-09-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Judgement

The Additional Sessions Judge at Cooch Behar acquitted Abu Bakkar Siddik of criminal breach of trust (IPC §409) for allegedly misappropriating old age pension funds. The court found the prosecution failed to prove both essential elements—factum of entrustment and factum of misappropriation—beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimony lacked cogent evidence and the complainant admitted receiving all pension money in her account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

11-12-2019
Order
22-12-2021
Order
01-08-2022
Order
13-02-2024
Order
12-04-2024
Order
25-11-2024
Order
02-09-2025
Order
14-01-2026
Order
03-02-2026
Order
09-03-2026
Order
casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Cooch Behar acquitted Abu Bakkar Siddik of criminal breach of trust (IPC §409) for allegedly misappropriating old age pension funds. The court found the prosecution failed to prove both essential elements—factum of entrustment and factum of misappropriation—beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimony lacked cogent evidence and the complainant admitted receiving all pension money in her account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case