State Of West Bengal vs Partha Pratim Adhikary — 24/2025
Case under Immoral Traffic (prevention) Act Section 9. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBCB010008412025
Filing Number
716/2025
Filing Date
05-04-2025
Registration No
24/2025
Registration Date
05-04-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
224
Police Station
Cooch Behar Women PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of West Bengal
Adv. P.P Cooch Behar
Respondent(s)
Partha Pratim Adhikary
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 15-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Partha Pratim Adhikary (24/2025) The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Partha Pratim Adhikary of charges under IPC sections 498A/370A/506 and the Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act, 1956. The victim (PW1) retracted her allegations, testifying she filed the complaint due to family dispute and maintenance issues, not trafficking. The two other prosecution witnesses had no knowledge of the alleged incidents. Finding insufficient evidence of physical torture or human trafficking, the court concluded the charges were unproven and discharged the accused from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Partha Pratim Adhikary (24/2025) The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Partha Pratim Adhikary of charges under IPC sections 498A/370A/506 and the Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act, 1956. The victim (PW1) retracted her allegations, testifying she filed the complaint due to family dispute and maintenance issues, not trafficking. The two other prosecution witnesses had no knowledge of the alleged incidents. Finding insufficient evidence of physical torture or human trafficking, the court concluded the charges were unproven and discharged the accused from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts