Mithun Miah alias Mithun Hoque alias Liton Ali vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 412/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010007152026

Filing Number

595/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

412/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

338

Police Station

Sahebganj

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mithun Miah alias Mithun Hoque alias Liton Ali

    Adv. Smt. Madhusree Roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Mithun Miah (also known as Mithun Hoque and Liton Ali) in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 338/2018 involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 436, and 427. The court found that since the charge sheet had been submitted after investigation completion and all co-accused persons were already on bail, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was set at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 412/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Mithun Miah (also known as Mithun Hoque and Liton Ali) in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 338/2018 involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 436, and 427. The court found that since the charge sheet had been submitted after investigation completion and all co-accused persons were already on bail, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was set at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case