Lingkon Mitra vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 402/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: WBCB010007032026
Filing Number
584/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
402/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
812
Police Station
PUNDIBARI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lingkon Mitra
Adv. Shirsendu Kumar Roy Basunia
Respondent(s)
State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 402/2026 – Lingkon Mitra v. State of West Bengal The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Lingkon Mitra under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Pundibari P.S. Case No. 812/2025 (involving charges under BNS Sections 189(2), 126(2), 221, 132, 121(1), 324(4)). The court found no direct allegation of assault against the petitioner, victims sustained only minor bodily pain with no serious injuries, and other co-accused had already been granted bail. The court concluded custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 402/2026 – Lingkon Mitra v. State of West Bengal The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Lingkon Mitra under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Pundibari P.S. Case No. 812/2025 (involving charges under BNS Sections 189(2), 126(2), 221, 132, 121(1), 324(4)). The court found no direct allegation of assault against the petitioner, victims sustained only minor bodily pain with no serious injuries, and other co-accused had already been granted bail. The court concluded custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts