Bikram Das vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 353/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010006072026

Filing Number

503/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

353/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

489

Police Station

PUNDIBARI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bikram Das

    Adv. Rinila Bagchi

  2. 2.Shakti Das

  3. 3.Niranjan Patni Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Bikram Das, Shakti Das, and Niranjan Patni Das under Section 438 CrPC in connection with charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 506, and 34. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted after investigation completion, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was set at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 353/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Bikram Das, Shakti Das, and Niranjan Patni Das under Section 438 CrPC in connection with charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 506, and 34. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted after investigation completion, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was set at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case