Chandan Rajbhar vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 352/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: WBCB010006042026
Filing Number
502/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
352/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
165
Police Station
KOTWALI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandan Rajbhar
Adv. Rinila Bagchi
Uttam Rajbhar
Lakkhi Rajbhar
Susmita Sarkar Rajbhar
Respondent(s)
State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for male accused Chandan Rajbhar and Uttam Rajbhar, finding sufficient evidence in the case diary showing their involvement in causing serious injury to the victim's right hand. However, bail was granted to female accused Lakkhi Rajbhar and Susmita Sarkar Rajbhar on a bond of ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for male accused Chandan Rajbhar and Uttam Rajbhar, finding sufficient evidence in the case diary showing their involvement in causing serious injury to the victim's right hand. However, bail was granted to female accused Lakkhi Rajbhar and Susmita Sarkar Rajbhar on a bond of ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts