Jiarul Rahaman vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 350/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: WBCB010006012026
Filing Number
499/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
350/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
72
Police Station
BAXIRHAT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jiarul Rahaman
Adv. Shah Nawaz Ahmed
-
2.Masud Alam
-
3.Faruk Hussain @ Faruk Rahaman
-
4.Bachir Mia @ Bachir Ali
-
5.Ranjan Ali
-
6.Manjila Bibi @ Chhamina Bibi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Final OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to all six accused petitioners in a case involving alleged kidnapping charges under sections 140(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that the victim girl had voluntarily left with the principal accused, no serious kidnapping allegation existed against the accused (who were parents and relatives), and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Each accused was granted bail of ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 350/2026
The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to all six accused petitioners in a case involving alleged kidnapping charges under sections 140(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that the victim girl had voluntarily left with the principal accused, no serious kidnapping allegation existed against the accused (who were parents and relatives), and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Each accused was granted bail of ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts