Sahibul Miah alalis Sahidul Miah vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 342/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005922026

Filing Number

492/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

342/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

PUNDIBARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sahibul Miah alalis Sahidul Miah

    Adv. Dulal Chandra Dey

  2. 2.Abul Kashim

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 342/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to accused Sahibul Miah and Abul Kashim in a case involving alleged criminal offences arising from a land dispute with neighbors. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary after examining case diary materials and the victim's injury report, noting this was a counter-case to one filed by the petitioners themselves. Each accused was granted bail of ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 342/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 342/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to accused Sahibul Miah and Abul Kashim in a case involving alleged criminal offences arising from a land dispute with neighbors. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary after examining case diary materials and the victim's injury report, noting this was a counter-case to one filed by the petitioners themselves. Each accused was granted bail of ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case