Subhajit Roy vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 341/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005902026

Filing Number

491/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

341/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

975

Police Station

PUNDIBARI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subhajit Roy

    Adv. Rinila Bagchi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 341/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Subhajit Roy in connection with Pundibari P.S. Case No. 975 of 2025 (involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 117(2), 77, 351(3), and 3(5)). The court found that since the chargesheet was already filed after investigation completion and all co-accused persons were already on bail, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Roy was required to furnish bail of ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 341/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 341/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Subhajit Roy in connection with Pundibari P.S. Case No. 975 of 2025 (involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 117(2), 77, 351(3), and 3(5)). The court found that since the chargesheet was already filed after investigation completion and all co-accused persons were already on bail, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Roy was required to furnish bail of ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case