Omar Faruque vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 336/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005822026

Filing Number

484/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

336/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

Cooch Behar Women PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Omar Faruque

    Adv. Manas Roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary: Case 336/2026 - Omar Faruque v. State of West Bengal The Sessions Judge rejected Omar Faruque's anticipatory bail petition under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with charges under section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found sufficient materials in the case diary demonstrating the accused's involvement in the alleged offence and, considering the gravity of the charges and submission of the charge sheet, declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 336/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 336/2026 - Omar Faruque v. State of West Bengal The Sessions Judge rejected Omar Faruque's anticipatory bail petition under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with charges under section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found sufficient materials in the case diary demonstrating the accused's involvement in the alleged offence and, considering the gravity of the charges and submission of the charge sheet, declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case