Hriday Barman vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 322/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 19th March 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: WBCB010005652026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
469/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
322/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
955
Police Station
PUNDIBARI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hriday Barman
Adv. Sangram Dutta
Respondent(s)
State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Hriday Barman in a rape case (Section 69, BNS). The court found sufficient evidence in the case diary and victim's statement indicating the petitioner was the principal accused, and considered the gravity of the offense precluded bail even though a chargesheet had been filed and co-accused persons were already on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Hriday Barman in a rape case (Section 69, BNS). The court found sufficient evidence in the case diary and victim's statement indicating the petitioner was the principal accused, and considered the gravity of the offense precluded bail even though a chargesheet had been filed and co-accused persons were already on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts