Hriday Barman vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 322/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 19th March 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: WBCB010005652026
Filing Number
469/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
322/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
955
Police Station
PUNDIBARI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hriday Barman
Adv. Sangram Dutta
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Hriday Barman in a rape case (Section 69, BNS). The court found sufficient evidence in the case diary and victim's statement indicating the petitioner was the principal accused, and considered the gravity of the offense precluded bail even though a chargesheet had been filed and co-accused persons were already on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 322/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Hriday Barman in a rape case (Section 69, BNS). The court found sufficient evidence in the case diary and victim's statement indicating the petitioner was the principal accused, and considered the gravity of the offense precluded bail even though a chargesheet had been filed and co-accused persons were already on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts