Majnu Miah vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 314/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005562026

Filing Number

460/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

219

Police Station

GHOKSADANGA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Majnu Miah

    Adv. Majharul Parvez

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Majnu Miah under section 482 of BNSS (corresponding to section 438 CrPC) in a kidnapping case under IPC section 364A. The court found Miah to be the principal accused and mastermind based on case diary materials and victim statements, determining that custodial trial was necessary given the severity of the offense and already-filed charge sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Majnu Miah under section 482 of BNSS (corresponding to section 438 CrPC) in a kidnapping case under IPC section 364A. The court found Miah to be the principal accused and mastermind based on case diary materials and victim statements, determining that custodial trial was necessary given the severity of the offense and already-filed charge sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case