Bikash Rava vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 308/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005462026

Filing Number

450/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

308/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

287

Police Station

BAXIRHAT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bikash Rava

    Adv. Utpal Kumar Pal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 308/2026 Decision: The Sessions Judge rejected Bikash Rava's anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Reasoning: Rava, the husband of the deceased victim, was identified as the principal accused in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 498A (cruelty), 306 (abetment of suicide), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). After reviewing the charge sheet, post-mortem report, inquest report, and witness statements in the case diary, the court found material evidence of Rava's involvement in the alleged offense. Given the gravity of the charges and the strength of incriminating materials, the court determined that custodial trial was necessary and bail was inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 308/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 308/2026 Decision: The Sessions Judge rejected Bikash Rava's anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Reasoning: Rava, the husband of the deceased victim, was identified as the principal accused in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 498A (cruelty), 306 (abetment of suicide), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). After reviewing the charge sheet, post-mortem report, inquest report, and witness statements in the case diary, the court found material evidence of Rava's involvement in the alleged offense. Given the gravity of the charges and the strength of incriminating materials, the court determined that custodial trial was necessary and bail was inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case