Mangla Das vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 307/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005452026

Filing Number

449/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

307/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

657

Police Station

Sahebganj

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mangla Das

    Adv. Mriganka kr. Roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Court of Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Mangla Das in Bail Petition No. 307/2026. The petitioner was accused under sections 126(2), 117(2), 109, and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 657 of 2025. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted after investigation completion, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court allowed bail at ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each, subject to conditions under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 307/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Mangla Das in Bail Petition No. 307/2026. The petitioner was accused under sections 126(2), 117(2), 109, and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 657 of 2025. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted after investigation completion, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court allowed bail at ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each, subject to conditions under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case