Ajima Khatun alias Ajima Bibi vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 306/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005442026

Filing Number

448/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

306/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

TUFANGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajima Khatun alias Ajima Bibi

    Adv. Utpal Kumar Pal

  2. 2.Rajib Haque

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 306/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajima Khatun and Rajib Haque (wife and son of the principal accused) in a property dispute case. The court found no direct allegations against them and determined custodial interrogation unnecessary. Each petitioner was granted bail of ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 306/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 306/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajima Khatun and Rajib Haque (wife and son of the principal accused) in a property dispute case. The court found no direct allegations against them and determined custodial interrogation unnecessary. Each petitioner was granted bail of ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case