Firdoas Ali alias Firdous Rahaman vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 303/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: WBCB010005392026
Filing Number
444/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
303/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
694
Police Station
Sahebganj
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Firdoas Ali alias Firdous Rahaman
Adv. Sayan Chakraborty
-
2.Hijamuddin Miah
-
3.Patani Begam @ Chhakina Bibi
-
4.Rafina Begam @ Rejina Khatun
-
5.Nur Alam Miah @ Nuralom Sake
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Firdoas Ali (the husband and principal accused in a domestic violence case involving charges under BNS sections 85 and 109(1)), finding sufficient evidence against him in the case diary. However, bail was granted to the four co-accused in-laws (petitioners 2-5) as no serious allegations were found against them, each required to furnish ₹4,000 bail with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 303/2026
Case Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Firdoas Ali (the husband and principal accused in a domestic violence case involving charges under BNS sections 85 and 109(1)), finding sufficient evidence against him in the case diary. However, bail was granted to the four co-accused in-laws (petitioners 2-5) as no serious allegations were found against them, each required to furnish ₹4,000 bail with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts