Jagadish Barman vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 289/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESS on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005242026

Filing Number

429/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

289/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--NOT PRESS

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

136

Police Station

KOTWALI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagadish Barman

    Adv. Rinila Bagchi

  2. 2.Shyamal Roy @ Barman

  3. 3.Chinmoy Barman

  4. 4.Ramprasad Barman

  5. 5.Bimal Barman

  6. 6.Goutam Barman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court of Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition as "not pressed" after the accused's counsel withdrew the application during the hearing, which was not opposed by the Public Prosecutor. The court disposed of the application and directed that records be returned and uploaded on the official court website. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court of Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition as "not pressed" after the accused's counsel withdrew the application during the hearing, which was not opposed by the Public Prosecutor. The court disposed of the application and directed that records be returned and uploaded on the official court website. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case