Md Malem (Musalem) alias Md Machiem vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010005062026

Filing Number

412/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

KUCHLIBARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md Malem (Musalem) alias Md Machiem

    Adv. Bikul Kumar Saha

  2. 2.Md. Suhel Rana @ Sohel Rana

  3. 3.Md. Bella @ Md. Bellal Hosen

  4. 4.Norul Haque @ Md. Narul Haque

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 275/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Md. Malem, Md. Suhel Rana, and Md. Bella (and co-accused) in an animal cruelty case. The court found sufficient materials in the case diary and witness statements to indicate the accused's involvement in the alleged crimes and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary at the investigation's early stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 275/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Md. Malem, Md. Suhel Rana, and Md. Bella (and co-accused) in an animal cruelty case. The court found sufficient materials in the case diary and witness statements to indicate the accused's involvement in the alleged crimes and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary at the investigation's early stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case