Anowar Hossain vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 252/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010004702026

Filing Number

383/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

533

Police Station

DINHATA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anowar Hossain

    Adv. Smt. Madhusree Roy

  2. 2.Cittaranjan Biswas @ Chityaranjan Biswas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Anowar Hossain and Chittaranjan Biswas in a case involving charges under IPC sections 341, 186, 353, 325, 307, 506, and 34. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted and custodial interrogation was unnecessary, bail was warranted. Each accused must furnish ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Anowar Hossain and Chittaranjan Biswas in a case involving charges under IPC sections 341, 186, 353, 325, 307, 506, and 34. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted and custodial interrogation was unnecessary, bail was warranted. Each accused must furnish ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case