Majidul Haque vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 241/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010004552026

Filing Number

369/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

241/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

TUFANGANJ

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Majidul Haque

    Adv. Utpal Kumar Pal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court of Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Majidul Haque under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving charges under IPC sections 186, 188, 332, 333, 353, 506, and 34. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted after investigation completion and all co-accused were on bail, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was fixed at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 241/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court of Cooch Behar granted anticipatory bail to Majidul Haque under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving charges under IPC sections 186, 188, 332, 333, 353, 506, and 34. The court found that since the charge sheet had already been submitted after investigation completion and all co-accused were on bail, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was fixed at ₹4,000 with two sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case