Rajib Barman vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 237/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010004462026

Filing Number

364/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

237/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

MATHABHANGA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajib Barman

    Adv. Snigdharup Sengupta

  2. 2.Bimala Barman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected anticipatory bail for Rajib Barman, finding sufficient evidence in the case diary and injury report showing his involvement in the alleged offences under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 324(4), 303(2), and 351(2). However, the court granted anticipatory bail to Bimala Barman (the co-accused and wife) as no incriminating material was found against her, setting bail at ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected anticipatory bail for Rajib Barman, finding sufficient evidence in the case diary and injury report showing his involvement in the alleged offences under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 324(4), 303(2), and 351(2). However, the court granted anticipatory bail to Bimala Barman (the co-accused and wife) as no incriminating material was found against her, setting bail at ₹4,000 with two registered sureties of ₹2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case