Alemul Hoque Sarkar alais Alemul Haq Sarkar vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010003982026

Filing Number

325/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

153

Police Station

Sahebganj

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Alemul Hoque Sarkar alais Alemul Haq Sarkar

    Adv. Sri. Sandip Roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Alemul Hoque Sarkar in an NDPS case, finding that the petitioner was the owner of the motorcycle used to carry narcotic drugs and had knowledge of its misuse by the principal accused. The court noted that the vehicle lacked a number plate at the time of the offense, indicating the petitioner's involvement, and considered the gravity of the offense sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Alemul Hoque Sarkar in an NDPS case, finding that the petitioner was the owner of the motorcycle used to carry narcotic drugs and had knowledge of its misuse by the principal accused. The court noted that the vehicle lacked a number plate at the time of the offense, indicating the petitioner's involvement, and considered the gravity of the offense sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case