Patli Khatun alais Patili Bgum alais Patili Begam vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 129/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESS on 01st April 2026.

Bail Petition

CNR: WBCB010002152026

Case disposed

Filing Number

185/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

27-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--NOT PRESS

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

HALDIBARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Patli Khatun alais Patili Bgum alais Patili Begam

Adv. Bikul Kumar Saha

Jarifa Khatun

Respondent(s)

State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

01-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

06-03-2026

Hearing

20-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Final Order

Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 129/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Patli Khatun and Jarifa Khatun as "not pressed" after their counsel withdrew the petition during the hearing on 01/04/2026. The Public Prosecutor did not oppose the withdrawal, and the court accordingly disposed of the application with directions to note the rejection in the Case Diary and forward the order to the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

27-01-2026
Order
29-01-2026
Order
04-02-2026
Order
20-02-2026
Order
06-03-2026
Order
09-03-2026
Order
13-03-2026
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 129/2026 The Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Patli Khatun and Jarifa Khatun as "not pressed" after their counsel withdrew the petition during the hearing on 01/04/2026. The Public Prosecutor did not oppose the withdrawal, and the court accordingly disposed of the application with directions to note the rejection in the Case Diary and forward the order to the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case