Prasanta Deb vs State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar — 118/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESS on 09th March 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: WBCB010001952026
Filing Number
169/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
118/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Coochbehar
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--NOT PRESS
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
Sahebganj
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prasanta Deb
Adv. Dulal Chandra Dey
-
2.Purnima Roy
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of West Bengal Advocate - P.P Cooch Behar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court of Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition as "not pressed" after the petitioner's advocate withdrew the application, which had not been opposed by the Public Prosecutor. The court directed that the rejection order be recorded in the Case Diary and communicated to the Trial Court for notation in the case record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2026
Summary The Sessions Court of Cooch Behar rejected the anticipatory bail petition as "not pressed" after the petitioner's advocate withdrew the application, which had not been opposed by the Public Prosecutor. The court directed that the rejection order be recorded in the Case Diary and communicated to the Trial Court for notation in the case record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts