STATE OF WESTBENGAL vs NARAYAN SINGH SARDAR Advocate - Chanchal Kumar Roy — 7/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 3762n. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 22nd May 2026.
Special Court Cases
CNR: WBBK090001652023
Filing Number
78/2023
Filing Date
11-May-2023
Registration No
7/2023
Registration Date
11-May-2023
Court
Additional District Judge, Khatra, Bankura
Judge
25-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
HIRBANDH
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WESTBENGAL
Adv. LD. SPECIAL PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARAYAN SINGH SARDAR Advocate - Chanchal Kumar Roy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
-
22-May-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Narayan Singh Sardar (7/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted accused Narayan Singh Sardar of charges under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical deficiencies: the victim's age could not be conclusively established as below 18 years; medical examination showed no signs of forceful assault; the investigating officer was not examined; and witness testimonies contained significant inconsistencies and contradictions. The mother's admission that the victim was a major at the time of incident fatally undermined the POCSO Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2026
Judgement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2024
Evidence
ADJ
-
06-Dec-2023
Evidence
ADJ
-
02-Sep-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
02-Sep-2023
Evidence
ADJ
-
11-Aug-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
04-Aug-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
04-Aug-2023
Evidence
ADJ
-
28-Jul-2023
Evidence
ADJ
-
19-Jul-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
10-Jul-2023
Production
ADJ
-
26-Jun-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
26-Jun-2023
Production
ADJ
-
12-Jun-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
12-Jun-2023
Production
ADJ
-
29-May-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
29-May-2023
Production
ADJ
-
19-May-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
19-May-2023
Production
ADJ
-
16-May-2023
Copy of orderView PDF
-
16-May-2023
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ
-
11-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2023
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Narayan Singh Sardar (7/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted accused Narayan Singh Sardar of charges under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical deficiencies: the victim's age could not be conclusively established as below 18 years; medical examination showed no signs of forceful assault; the investigating officer was not examined; and witness testimonies contained significant inconsistencies and contradictions. The mother's admission that the victim was a major at the time of incident fatally undermined the POCSO Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts