RAKHAHARI KAPAS AND 04 OTHERS vs RAMARATAN KAPAS AND RAMNALIN KAPAS — 37/2025
Case under The West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 Section 14. Status: Further Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: WBBK070000532025
Filing Number
142/2025
Filing Date
24-Mar-2025
Registration No
37/2025
Registration Date
25-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Judge Sr. Divn., Bishnupur, Bankura
Judge
20-Civil Judge Sr Div
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKHAHARI KAPAS AND 04 OTHERS
Adv. Indranarayan Biswas.
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMARATAN KAPAS AND RAMNALIN KAPAS
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-May-2026
Further Evidence
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
12-Mar-2026
Daily OrdersView PDF
Case 37/2025 Summary: Case adjourned on 12.03.2026 as no steps were taken by the parties. The cross-examination of PW-1 (Prosecution Witness-1) was rescheduled to 11.05.2026. The adjournment was granted due to the Regular Presiding Officer being on SIR duty per Supreme Court directions and advocates requesting no adverse order be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Further Evidence
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
03-Jan-2026
Further Evidence
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
19-Nov-2025
Daily OrdersView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Further Evidence
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
26-Aug-2025
Daily OrdersView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
P.H
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
15-Jul-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
22-May-2025
Daily OrdersView PDF
-
22-May-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
07-May-2025
Daily OrdersView PDF
-
07-May-2025
P.H
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
30-Apr-2025
Hearing of Petition
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
08-Apr-2025
Daily OrdersView PDF
-
08-Apr-2025
Hearing of Petition
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
25-Mar-2025
Daily OrdersView PDF
-
25-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2025
Case 37/2025 Summary: Case adjourned on 12.03.2026 as no steps were taken by the parties. The cross-examination of PW-1 (Prosecution Witness-1) was rescheduled to 11.05.2026. The adjournment was granted due to the Regular Presiding Officer being on SIR duty per Supreme Court directions and advocates requesting no adverse order be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts